🔗 Share this article

Whenever a significant prize-giving event nears, there’s always a demand for the addition of new categories to acknowledge unsung work and delight the passions of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. That would rule. The same goes for strategy board titles, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist when I prioritize because like all single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal stands as crucial and important of all. This is the request: There should be an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and inevitably generate discussions and end in fuzzy definitions. It's understandable that film award organizations avoid this approach. But it is a necessary evil in the world of video games, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to be recognized, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Leading game ceremonies presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these classifications effectively encompass a lot of ground, allowing placement for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, each quite distinct: building puzzles from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles of a third title. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens outstanding logic titles released every year lacking appropriate categories during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

• An iconic brain-teaser wasn’t nominated for anything during that awards season
• A different innovative game was excluded that year
• A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment recently
• Limited numbers of logic titles managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often modest productions, however the design in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most popular titles worldwide and have been for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience rivals popular creative games claiming status as most purchased experience; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, and engaging across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. It would be easy to populate five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the hard edge game development, producing among essential manifestations of the video game form. Just like cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay 35 years.